Mon premier blog

The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us by Victor J. Stenger

The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us Victor J. Stenger ebook
Page: 285
Publisher: Prometheus Books
Format: pdf
ISBN: 9781616144449

Jul 3, 2011 - Apparently Collins hasn't read Victor Stenger's The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning. It is a The fine tuning argument is not driven by the improbability of just any universe coming into existence, like the probability of someone winning the lottery, which might be high. May 5, 2014 - Some philosophers have noted that the fine tuning argument is not vastly good argument for the existence of God but rather a vastly good argument for the non-existence of God. Mar 10, 2014 - But the Christian god is supposed to be non-physical, infinite, immutable, incorruptible, supernatural and not man-made. May 13, 2012 - Studies by Yale psychologists Bloom and Weisberg have suggested that children "naturally see the world in terms of design and purpose."[1] They have .. R:As atheist physicist Brian Green noted, we live in a fine-tuned universe and this implies an ultimate purpose. It certainly need not be inhospitable. Fallacy of Fine-Tuning, The: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us (Kindle Locations 453-461). It commits the If the universe were designed for us, then a Genesis-type cosmology is what we should expect: humans are created at the inception of all things, and the universe need not be any bigger or older than is required to support our existence. It's good practice This, in my experience, has not been done when the accusation of the lottery fallacy is made. Victor Stenger – The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why The Universe is Not Designed For Us. For my part, I've addressed the argument on several occasions. So, the probability that we would exist in a universe capable of supporting us is 1. If there is no god, we will only ever find ourselves in a universe finely tuned (in that case, by random chance), because without a god, there is no other kind of universe that can produce us. Nov 17, 2011 - Regarding the fine-tuning hypothesis, I have looked into it, although not as much as other hypotheses, for a very simple reason. That reason has to do with the As for your contention that we are fine-tuned for living on earth AND that earth is fine-tuned for us to exist on it, well, that just doesn't make sense. Furthermore, the "fine-tuning argument" is a logical fallacy of the "ex-post-facto statistics" type. May 5, 2010 - But the refutation of this criticism is not mentioned at all, leaving the impression that this thinking tool should dissuade us from embracing the fine tuning argument. May 11, 2014 - We'll get to demolishing Armstrong's specific supporting arguments (if one can call them that) shortly, but there is another reason besides logical flaws why arguments from design are not much in favor these days–even among (thoughtful) theists themselves. Furthermore, the "fine tuning" of Brian Green seems to not be the same "fine tuning" you imply.